Guidance for Joint Commission Evaluations

Computing / Engineering Joint Evaluations

When a program name requires joint review by both the Computing Accreditation Commission and the Engineering Accreditation Commission, the program should follow the Self-Study Questionnaire: Template for the Engineering Self-Study Report (DOC). In addition, the program should:

• Describe the process used for establishing and revising any student outcomes that the program has defined other than (a) through (k) from the Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, Criterion 3, and
   
• Complete a second Table 5.1, as specified in the Criteria for Accrediting Computing Programs.

Computing / Technology Joint Evaluations

When a program name requires joint review by both the Computing Accreditation Commission and the Technology Accreditation Commission, the program should follow the Self-Study Questionnaire: Template for the Technology Self-Study Report (DOC). In addition, the program should:

• Complete (1) Section  3.D and a (2) second Table 5.1 from the Self-Study Questionnaire: Template for the Computing Self-Study Report (DOC).