As one of our experts, you serve your profession by contributing your professional experience, judgment, and time. You have a direct impact on the quality of technical education in your field.
Academic programs are evaluated against a set of criteria, developed by the applied science, computing, engineering, and engineering technology professions. These criteria outline the requirements for student support, quality and appropriateness of faculty and facilities, relevance of curriculum, continuous quality improvement processes, and other key program areas. Learn more about the criteria.
You do this by:
Reviewing the Self Study Report.
In late summer, PEVs assigned to accreditation review teams begin their work by reviewing the self-study report prepared by the program seeking accreditation. The self-study report contains information about the institution, as well as detailed information illustrating how the academic program meets the evaluation criteria. You review this information and, if necessary, communicate with the program directly to resolve ambiguities or to answer questions raised by the report. Learn more about the self-study report.
Participating in the on-site visit.
During the fall (typically between September and December), each accreditation review team, consisting of two or more PEVs and an evaluation team chair, travels to the campus and spends approximately 2.5 days investigating their assigned program with the help of the program’s chair and faculty. On-site activities include:
- verifying the information provided in the self-study report
- observing classes
- interviewing students, faculty members, administrators,staff, and external stakeholders
- visiting classrooms, labs, and other key facilities
- reviewing textbooks, course syllabi, student work and assessment materials
Based on a review of the self-study report and observations made on campus, the program evaluators collaboratively prepare a draft report describing how well the program has met the ABET criteria. This draft statement is provided to the institution at the conclusion of the campus visit. Learn more about the on-site visit.
Improving the evaluation process
In addition to submitting a travel expense report, program evaluators returning from on-site visits also complete a survey evaluating the performance of their team members. A PEV may also respond to additional questions from the team chair who is finalizing the team’s report.
Once we receive your travel expense report, we will reimburse your travel expenses for the on-site visit.
How much time do you need to commit?
12–20 hours online and 1.5 days of face-to-face training.
The online portion of Program Evaluator Candidate Training typically takes 12–20 hours and requires written work and the completion of three end-of-module quizzes, as well as attendance at a one and one-half day Face-to-Face Training workshop in Baltimore.
2-3 hours online Recertification Training every 5 years.
In addition to initial training and annual service, a comprehensive web-based Recertification Training is offered every five years to keep PEVs current on ABET criteria, processes, and procedures.
About 6-9 days a year - extended over July-November
Once you have received your initial PEV training, you will typically spend:
- 3 hours per year in web-based visit preparation
- 2-6 days reviewing program materials
- 3 days for the on-site visit, plus 1-2 days of travel
The time required to review materials and conduct campus visits is spread over three to six months, from July through September or December. Training and materials review do not need to be completed during a single session.
You won’t necessarily receive an assignment every year.
Scheduling is based on the demand for accreditation services contributed by each professional society and on the availability of individual PEVs.